Anti-Fraud Awareness and Victimization Survey Template

Générer une invite (Prompt)

Envoyez cette description directement à l'IA Wenjuanpai pour obtenir un brouillon modifiable de ce questionnaire.

Design a ready-to-field structured survey on anti-fraud awareness and victimization for community residents, students and parents, retirees, and staff in money-handling roles. Cover six dimensions: exposure and channels (which warnings were seen in the past six months via community outreach, SMS, banks, short video, employer training, family, or friends); pattern recognition (separate ratings for refund scams, task-and-rebate scams, fake investment groups, impersonated authorities, screen-sharing requests, and AI voice or face impersonation); encounters and losses (which suspicious situations occurred, whether money was lost, and the loss range); response and help-seeking (hanging up, independent verification, consulting family, calling 96110 or 110, asking the bank to stop payment, or following instructions); household and intergenerational support (coaching older relatives, protective measures already in place, and confirmation rules for transfers); and messaging needs (preferred formats and specific suggestions).
Question requirements: generate about 12 questions, including 1 NPS item (0-10 likelihood of recommending a community anti-fraud activity to friends and relatives), 1 open-ended item (suggestions on content or channels), 1 scale item (1-5 recognition rating for each of six scam patterns), at least 3 multi-select items (warning channels, suspicious situation types, actions taken, household protections, preferred formats), at least 4 single-choice items (role, whether a loss occurred, loss range, whether the respondent coaches family), and 1 background item (city or area type). Items must ask about specific, recallable behaviors and situations rather than generic awareness.
Sampling and quality control: recruit by age band and role strata, oversampling retirees and parents of students as needed; state that loss-amount answers are collected for aggregate statistics only and reported anonymously; to compare messaging effects, repeat the same instrument before and after a campaign with at least two months between measurements. Results support messaging evaluation and prioritization only, not individual case filing or recovery, and case handling should go through official channels such as 96110 or 110.
Output only the complete prompt that can be pasted directly into the WeJot AI generator, with no extra commentary.

Questions représentatives incluses

1. 1Question à choix unique

   Which best describes your current role?

   Community resident (employed)Resident (retired or not currently employed)StudentParent of a studentFinance, cashier, or other money-handling roleSelf-employed or freelanceCommunity or workplace anti-fraud staff
2. 2Question à choix multiples

   In the past six months, where have you seen anti-fraud warnings? (Select all that apply)

   Community notice boards, building posters, or door-to-door outreachSMS or telecom operator alertsBank branch or mobile banking noticesShort video, livestream, or social platform contentReminders from family, neighbors, or colleaguesEmployer or school trainingPolice visits or neighborhood broadcastsI have not seen any
3. 3Question d'échelle

   Rate how well you can recognize each pattern (1 = cannot tell at all, 5 = can spot it immediately): fake customer service refunds or membership cancellation; task-and-rebate or commission jobs; fake investment or stock-tipping groups; impersonated police or prosecutors demanding a transfer to a 'safe account'; requests to share your screen or provide verification codes; AI-generated voice or face impersonation of friends and relatives.

   Cannot tell at all (1)Cannot tell most of the time (2)Neutral (3)Can usually identify (4)Can spot immediately (5)
4. 4Question à choix multiples

   Which suspicious situations have you personally encountered in the past six months? (Select all that apply)

   Calls claiming a parcel, medical insurance, social security, or account problemBeing added to rebate, commission, or stock-tipping groupsSomeone posing as support staff asking to process a refund or close a membershipSomeone posing as police, prosecutors, or a regulator asking for cooperationImpersonation of a relative or manager asking for money in chat or videoLinks about prizes, subsidies, or tax refundsNone of these
5. 5Question à choix unique

   Did any of these situations cause an actual loss for you or your family?

   Yes, a large amountYes, a small amountNo loss, but I almost followed the instructionsNo loss and no pressure to actNot sure whether it was fraud-related
6. 6Question à choix unique

   If a loss occurred, which range best describes the amount? (Choose 'Not applicable' if there was no loss)

   Under 1,000 CNY1,000 to 10,000 CNY10,000 to 100,000 CNYOver 100,000 CNYNot applicable
7. 7Question à choix multiples

   The last time you encountered a suspicious situation, what did you actually do? (Select all that apply)

   Hung up or did not replySearched online or called the official customer service line to verifyDiscussed it with family or friends firstCalled 96110 or 110, or reported it to a community officerContacted the bank or payment platform to stop payment or freeze the accountFollowed part of the caller's instructionsDid not pay attention at the time and only realized later
8. 8Question à choix unique

   Do you proactively warn or help family members, especially older relatives, identify scam messages?

   Often, whenever I come across oneOccasionally, when something looks clearly suspiciousRarely, they do not listen or it is hard to communicateNever
9. 9Question à choix multiples

   Which protective steps has your household already taken? (Select all that apply)

   Installed a national anti-fraud app on older relatives' phonesEnabled blocking for unknown or international callsAgreed that large transfers require family confirmation firstRegularly explain newly reported scam patterns to older relativesSet transfer limits on mobile bankingNone of these
10. 10Score net de promoteur (NPS)

    On a 0-10 scale, where 10 means extremely likely and 0 means not at all likely, how likely are you to recommend that friends and relatives join an anti-fraud awareness activity organized by your community or employer?

    0-6: would not recommend7-8: neutral9-10: would recommend
11. 11Question à choix multiples

    Which outreach formats work best for you? (Select up to 3)

    Door-to-door explanations or real case postings in the buildingShort video or livestream dramatizationsRegular reminders pushed to resident or workplace chat groupsPoint-of-action reminders at banks, parcel stations, and similar venuesCentralized training organized by employers or schoolsPolice visits or community talksSMS and incoming-call pop-up alerts
12. 12Question ouverte

    Do you have specific suggestions about anti-fraud messaging, such as which scam types you want to learn about or which channels you prefer?

    Please write your answer