Recruitment Promise and Employer Trust Survey Template

HR & WorkplaceQuestionnaire

Recruitment Promise and Employer Trust Survey Template

For three audiences after a mass-rescission or offer-withdrawal incident (affected parties, candidates, and current employees): measures employer-brand trust damage and repair conditions through the four fairness components plus a behavior checklist.

Generation Prompt

Paste this brief into WeJot AI to generate an editable first draft of this survey.

Please design a structured and executable survey questionnaire for the 'Recruitment Promise and Employer Trust Survey Template'.  
Research objective: Target three audiences after a mass-rescission or offer-withdrawal incident—graduates/candidates whose contracts were rescinded or who were directly affected, unaffected job candidates, and current employees—to measure employer-brand trust damage and repair conditions. Cover five dimensions: audience and incident awareness (identity, whether they know about the incident and its details), the four fairness components (rate procedural/distributive/interpersonal/informational fairness separately), remedy and aftercare perception (awareness and proportionality of remedies), behavior change and trust (whether they withdrew applications, cancelled interviews, continued engagement, or shared negative comments), and word-of-mouth and repair conditions (targeted recommendation intent, likelihood of reconsideration within the next year, and conditions for restoring trust).  
Question type requirements: Generate about 10-11 questions, including: 1 NPS question (0-10 likelihood of encouraging a same-major friend to apply to this company), 1 open-ended question (under what conditions they would restore trust and recommend, with specifics), 1 scale question (rate the four fairness statements on procedure/distribution/interpersonal/information from 1-5), 3-4 multi-select questions (remedial measures, post-incident behavior checklist), 3-4 single-choice questions (identity, awareness, negotiation opportunity, future engagement intention, remedy proportionality), and 1 background question (city). Wording should be adapted per audience; the company/incident name should be a placeholder.  
Sample and quality control: For affected graduates the list is small—aim for full reach and check response bias; stratify candidates by aware/unaware; use an anonymous channel for employees. For a recovery curve, run waves at months 1, 3, and 6 after the incident with the same scales. State the collection date and incident stage in the report; compliance and compensation conclusions are not based on this questionnaire.  
Please output a complete prompt that can be pasted directly into 'Wenjuanpai AI', without any extra explanatory text.

Sample questions

  1. 1Single choice

    Which group do you belong to?

    A party whose contract was rescinded or directly affectedA job candidate (not directly affected)A current employee of the companyOther
  2. 2Single choice

    Are you aware of the recent mass rescission of campus recruits at this company?

    Yes, and I know many detailsYes, in general but not the detailsHeard of it but unclearNot at all aware
  3. 3Scale

    Please rate the following four statements (1=strongly disagree, 5=strongly agree): The company explained the rules in advance and gave me a chance to express my views; The compensation and remedies matched my loss; The communication was respectful, without dismissal or humiliation; The company promptly and candidly explained the reasons and follow-up arrangements.

    Strongly disagree (1)Disagree (2)Neutral (3)Agree (4)Strongly agree (5)
  4. 4Single choice

    During the process, did you have an opportunity to express your views or negotiate?

    Yes, and I used itYes, but I did not use itNo opportunity was givenNot applicable
  5. 5Multiple choice

    Which of the company's remedial measures have you heard of or used? (Select all that apply)

    Job-search living subsidyDedicated job fairs or position matchingFree transitional housingA formal apology and explanationHeard of noneNot applicable
  6. 6Multiple choice

    After the incident, which of the following have you done? (Select all that apply)

    Withdrew or edited an applicationCancelled or postponed an interviewStopped following the company's recruitingContinued normal engagement or interviewsShared negative comments with othersTook no action
  7. 7NPS

    Based on what you know, how likely are you to encourage a same-major friend to apply to this company? (0-10, with 10 meaning extremely likely to recommend)

    0 (Not at all likely)5 (Neutral)8 (Somewhat likely)10 (Extremely likely)
  8. 8Single choice

    How likely are you to reconsider or continue engaging with this company in the next year (or next recruiting season)?

    Will reconsider or continue engagingWill wait and decide after seeing follow-up actionsWill not consider itNot applicable
  9. 9Open text

    Under what conditions would you restore trust and be willing to recommend this company to friends? Please be specific (e.g., remedies, institutional improvement, time).

  10. 10Single choice

    Do you think the company's current remedies and apology match the opportunities lost by those affected?

    Yes, beyond expectationsBasically proportionateInsufficientNo substantive remedy seenNot applicable
  11. 11Single choice

    Which city tier do you live in or prefer for job search?

    First-tier or new first-tier citySecond- or third-tier cityCounty town or townshipUndecided